Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime

Winny Puhh: "Meiecundimees Üks Korsakov Läks Eile Lätti"

Get to Know a Contributor

Listed here are 5 Stuff You Certainly Did not Learn about Melissa McEwanz:1. She collects quality recipes. Particularly egg salad quality recipes. She keeps these questions journal entitled Egg Salad Dreams and Reminiscences.2. She's suuuper into pan flute music.3. She's seen SpaceCamp (starring Kate Capshaw, Ray B. Scott, and Jum Thompson) as many as 39 occasions: Six occasions in theaters, 27 occasions on VHS, four occasions on laser disc and two times on Betamax.4. She loves chalk sketches. 5. She's a whole group of Aaron Carter dolls on her behalf desk:TruFact™: Before I had been over I attempted to experience together with her Aaron Carter dolls and she or he got sooooooooooo mad! "They are MIB, jerk! Don't muss them up!" she yelled. Dang!

BOOM.

Daily Dose of Cute

"Yeah, I am fuzzy. What exactly? You wanna make something from it?InchOf course, please feel welcome and urged to talk about pix from the fuzzy, feathered, or scaly people of ones own in comments.

Question of the Day

What is the best comeback you have ever had that you simply did not reach use since you considered it 10-seconds (or ten hrs, or 10 days...) past too far?

Daily Dose of Cute

Dudley uses my leg like a pillow Saturday mid-day.Whenever we adopted Dudley, in April of 2010, he am frightened of me touching him that he'd pee on themself in fright basically got near him. I spent lengthy hrs laying on the ground, alongside his crate where he felt safe, syncing my breathing to his, quiet but still, to reassure him I'd never hurt him. Eventually, he arrived on the scene, and laid lower with me at night on the ground. I put my hands on his side, across a lengthy scar the roots which we don't know, and matched up him breath for breath. There we laid, until he tell me he required to venture out, and that i placed on his leash without making them fearful the very first time.It had not been until almost 2 yrs later he started a romantic snuggle beside me, after Zelda gave him an affection for searching for a cuddle with Two-Legs.Now, approaching our three-year anniversary of finding each other, there's no trace from the frightened dog who showed up. Not sometime ago, I went to sleep with my mind on his back, our heads meeting in the center of the couch as our physiques extended away in opposite directions. There we napped together to have an hour approximately, two contented little monsters, snoring away.* * *Of course, please feel welcome and urged to talk about pix from the fuzzy, feathered, or scaly people of ones own in comments.

The Virtual Pub Is Open

[Explanations: lol your body fat. pathetic anger bread. hey your gay.]TFIF, Shakers!Belly as much as the bar,and title your poison!You should also tip your bartenders!

In The News

[Content note: Gun violence, homophobia]There's Water at the end from the Sea:The Senate has soundly declined a financial budget plan written by irresponsible douchebag Paul Ryan.A Marine wiped out two co-workers at Quantico last evening before shooting themself.The Osmonds are hosting an anti-gay rally in Salt Lake City.Chinua Achebe, Nigerian author from the 1958 best-seller Things Break Apart, a sobering tale about Nigeria in the beginning of independence, has died.LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!! LOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!! LOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!! LOLOLOLOLOL!! LOLOL!!! LOLOLOL!!!!!!! LOLOL!!Yeah, I chosen for Dengar.

A Few More Thoughts on Adria Richards

You will find a few common criticisms I am seeing that I wish to give a response:1. To transmit an image was cowardly. Not a chance. I'm not sure Adria Richards, however i feel reasonably certain that she understood damn well that they risked this exact type of backlash, in character otherwise in scope, if you take the approach that they did. She wasn't a coward. She was brave.2. She must have nicely requested the men making sexist jokes to knock them back. Not a chance. It's a privilege to have the ability to suppose nicely asking might have stopped their behavior. Also it does not matter if in that one specific situation it might have, which we can't know. The context of the situation is the fact that ladies have been nicely (and impolitely) asking males to prevent acting in sexually inappropriate methods for centuries, and asking Does not WORK. Generally, facing males who're acting in sexually inappropriate ways only gets worse unsafety, instead of reducing it. This argument also elides racial energy differences while concurrently scolding a black lady on her "uppity" behavior.3. She must have gone and personally talked to the conference coordinators. Not a chance. See aforementioned differences. Also: It wasn't incumbent on Adria Richards to obtain up and then leave an expert conference and miss a part of something she desired to experience to be able to contact the conference coordinators. Her approach centered her to be there.4. She's past reacting wrongly. Not a chance. I'm not likely to audit the way in which Adria Richards has taken care of immediately other things, ever. What I will do is realize that where and how someone responds to something marginalizing is very determined by how one perceives the chance they're took in to and brought seriously.I'm also sharing my very own personal expertise, for many perspective: My concerns about anything are routinely ignored based on my as being a body fat lady. It does not appear the problem is: Even speaking about Adria on Twitter today, comments about how exactly body fat I'm were immediate. Ladies who have intersecting axes of marginalization improve by experience that even those who are our ostensible allies by other bits of shared identification might be disinclined to hear us.Which has produced, for me personally, a desire to report concerns and criticisms within my own space or via my very own alternative techniques, in places and ways in which feel safe in my experience. It's also meant, straight-up, that I am more prone to be heard than following traditional channels and routes.I'm not sure if the was a part of Adria's calculation. I can not state that it's been a conscious technique of mine, however i identify my very own instincts to "go rogue" within her story. I certainly know other women of color—and body fat women, and queer women, and disabled women, et. al.—who now utilize, purposely or otherwise, exactly the same strategy.If you have an issue with that strategy, go track of those who necessitate it, not individuals people who utilize it.

Please, No More Dating Guides

[Content Note: Rape, Sexual Harassment]It takes place each time there is a rape trial given national attention or perhaps an incident of sexual harassment highly promoted inside a community: people start producing dating guides claiming to train males how to locate sex without turning to rape. Which "dating guides" usually have bothered me, however it required an in-depth conversation with Liss that i can really realise why they upset me a lot. This publish is really a product of this conversation and her collaboration, and it is published here together with her permission. I realize the great intentions behind these guides, I truly do. Generally, the authors reference the concept that we have to train males to not rape (instead of disseminate "rape avoidance tips" focusing on victim behavior and victim-accusing stories) and seem like a publish how up to now and/or hook-up without raping could be an optimistic contribution to that particular effort. However I also feel that such guides, released in direct reaction to a really public incident of rape or sexual harassment, are in position to do more damage than good. Allied persons inclined to speak with males about the need for consent-seeking need to understand the injury of writing them in explicit reaction to specific functions of sexual violence.The guides disregard the actual current narrative in support of a imaginary one. The posts I have observed in the wake from the Steubenville rape situation have largely focused on not sleeping with females who're awake-but-drunk -- a story that obscures the truth that the Steubenville rape victim was unconscious. The posts I saw within the wake of Rebecca Watson's elevator encounter largely centered on when and how where to get women -- a story that overlooked the truth that Rebecca Watson had clearly and openly mentioned that they did not desire to be acquired whatsoever. These guides are wrenching real stories from women to be able to tell another story having a different context, and that is appropriation.The guides reinforce the narrative that rapists have no idea what they're doing. Some rapists don't realize that what they're doing legally comprises rape. But many do. Whenever we discuss "teaching males to not rape", we're not stating that rapists don't realize consent, but instead that rapists aren't trained to respect consent -- in addition to respect the humanity from the women they may otherwise decide to rape. The framework that rapists are cultivated to deliberately dehumanize their sufferers and override their consent in ways that should be methodically addressed by comprehensive socialization and education is essentially not the same as the framework that rapists are simply "unaware dudez" who require instructions regarding how to have sex inside a safe and satisfying manner.The guides reinforce the narrative that rape is really a misunderstanding. Like the above, when these "ways to get laid, rape-free" guides construct in painstaking detail how you can not 'accidentally' rape someone, the narrative that rape is a large misunderstanding is strengthened. The Steubenville rapists understood these were raping an unconscious lady, even when they did not decide to use the word 'rape' towards the situation -- and guides which elide this to be able to present rape because this exceedingly confusing and "grey area" situation where reasonably people could be completely baffled about consent and active participation is dangerous to rape sufferers by recommending that reasonable people can disagree concerning the validity of her rape.The guides elide the matter that for many rapists, rape isn't a bug, but an element of sexual interaction. Again: teaching males to not rape is not only teaching them what rape is. Teaching males to not rape means teaching these to see women as fully human and titled for their physiques and limitations, and teaching them that maleness is not about pressure and sexual gratification is not about energy. They are things that may be trained, but they're rarely things that'll be trained inside a dating guide. So what can be trained inside a dating guide may be the false narrative that males are exclusively motivated by sex which the rapist can give up his raping ways once he finds a sure-fire way of getting consensual sex.Just about all rapists get access to consensual sex. Some rapists get access to consensual sex using their sufferers. The supply of consensual sex is not related to the speed of rape, which guides obscure that reality. The Steubenville football star rapists did not rape an unconscious girl simply because they literally couldn't find any consensual sex and needed to turn to rape rather, and it is terribly wrong to pretend otherwise.The guides invisible women with prior intimate associations using their rapists. Framework rape prevention inside the narrative of the dating guide elides the truth that many rape sufferers have existing intimate associations using their rapists. I'd prior sexual interactions (including, in a single situation, a lengthy-standing established sexual relationship) with my rapists. My rapists weren't unclear about my consent or about my limitations rather they permitted me my consent if this was convenient on their behalf to ensure that they might maneuver me into a situation where they might override my consent without consequences. Teaching these males to respect my limitations may have avoided my rape teaching them how you can have consensual sex beside me will not have avoided my rape simply because they already had that.The guides entrench patriarchal entitlement to women's physiques. Diet program these "how you can win consensual sex so you don't have to rape!" guides read like pick-up artist instructions. When we frame rape grownups only if consensual sex is not available, only then do we go into the misogyny-laden twilight zone where t shirts like "Stop Rape. Agree.Inch are created. Not every women desire to be acquired. Not every women desire to be flirted with. Not every women wish to have sexual intercourse using the specific guy reading through the dating guide of the day.When these guides read as an encouragement the guy on the other hand from the monitor might have anything he wants and without needing to turn to rape, it ignores the truth that he can't have "anything" he wants because sex beside me is this is not on the table. He probably can have sexual intercourse with someone, but he equally certainly cannot have sexual intercourse with anybody. Yet since these guides unconditionally claim that all ladies can be found, which all ladies are achievable, they entrench patriarchal entitlement to women's physiques. "You're available therefore you've got to be open to me" is really actually one such rape justification -- it really can't be restored to be used in rape prevention. The guides imply Not A Rapist is not a reasonable reward. Whenever we train males to not rape because women deserve bodily autonomy and limitations, then males learn to not rape because rape is wrong also it means they are a poor person. Whenever we train males to not rape because you no longer need and you will find all, more valid methods for getting sexual gratification, then males learn to not rape because they will be compensated when they don't. You do not get snacks because of not as being a rapist. Nor in the event you. The dating guides that obsess with a mans author's experience and just how awesome these were because of not giving to the temptation to rape are particularly responsible for this, because too frequently they appear to become recommending that there are something laudable about selecting to not rape.Selecting to not rape is not a laudable act. It's a necessary-but-not-sufficient area of the minimum needed to be able to become qualified as a good person. But dating guides which claim that males questing for love on the nightly basis are brave and courageous and awesome because of not raping women with alcohol, drugs, coercion, and/or fear really are a main issue with the rape culture problem by normalizing rape and raising not-rape as something unusual and special on and on-the-extra-mile. Which, too, entrenches the concept that males are titled to womens' physiques: this concept that males are owed "reward sex" for the reason they haven't raped anybody recently.Next time a rape trial is offered national attention, or sexual harassment splashes over the head lines, or sexual violence is promoted lengthy enough and noisy enough and sensationally enough for everybody to weigh in around the problem for any couple of short days, don't write a how-to-get-laid-without-raping guide. Please. Do train males to not rape by teaching them that women are people, that consent is vital, that limitations really are a human right, that active participation is sexy, which rape of any sort and unconditionally isn't condoned on your part. Try not to "train" them how to prevent raping women through getting consensual sex from their store rather, because you are not just missing the purpose, you are area of the problem.

Quote of the Day

[Content Note: Rape culture.]The troubling result of many media shops towards the sentence of two teenage football gamers who have been charged of raping a 16-year-old girl is really a very obvious illustration of how society is constantly on the train boys that women and ladies are "under." Once we saw in Steubenville, and it is aftermath, this method to maleness leads some males and boys to perpetuate violence against ladies and other males and boys to stay quiet.This type of toxic maleness produces a culture that creates a national of conversation that express sympathy for that youthful boys that committed a criminal offense, concentrating on their destroyed football careers and uncertain futures imprisonment, while completely disregarding the victim. Where was the sympathy on her?We should challenge the way we raise boys regarding maleness, because it is frequently at the fee for women. I have recognized that society does not raise boys to become males we bring them up not to be women. The lives of males are inextricably intertwined using the lives of ladies. Women's questions of safety and equality have an effect on our way of life as males. Beyond that, women are humans, with similar privileges to safety and freedom as males.Rather than permitting the humiliation of the youthful girl to pass through unchallenged through social networking and text texting, we should train males it's our moral responsibility not to remain quiet or passively around the sidelines, but to become positively involved in facing this issue in each and every corner of houses, towns, and communities.—Former National football league quarterback and feminist Don McPherson, inside a pr release around the Steubenville rape situation and also the ugly media aftermath, ongoing to become awesome.See also: Zerlina Maxwell, Professor Salamishah Tillet, and Irin Carmon.

Afternoon in America 2.0

[Content Note: Invasion of Privacy, Stalking] Creative Good—The Google Glass feature nobody is speaking about: Now pretend you do not know an individual who wears Google Glass… and go for a walk outdoors. Anywhere you use public – any store, any pavement, any bus or subway – you’re prone to be recorded: video and audio. Fifty people around the bus may be Glassless, but when an individual putting on Glass will get on, you – and all sorts of 49 other people – might be recorded. Not for one temporary throwaway video buffer, just like a home security camera, but recorded, saved permanently, and shared around the world.Now, I understand the response: “I’m recorded by video security cameras all day long, it doesn’t bother me, what’s the main difference?” Hear me out – I am not done. Why is Glass so unique is the fact that it’s a Google project. And Google has the ability to mix Glass along with other technologies it is the owner of....10 years from now, someone, some company, or some organization, takes a desire for you, really wants to determine if you’ve ever stated what you consider offensive, or threatening, or simply features a reference to a particular word or phrase they like. Just one search query within Google’s cloud – whether started with a openly available search, or perhaps a federal subpoena, or anything among – will instantly mention documentation of each and every word you’ve ever spoken within earshot of the Google Glass device.This is actually the discussion we ought to have about Google Glass. The tech community, by all privileges, ought to be leading this discussion. Yet most techies today continue to be chattering about whether they’ll look awesome putting on the unit.Nice! I am certain this selection will not negatively affect individuals privacy, and I am certain that any information collected with these features should never be misused by the us government, large companies, or internet cyber-terrorist. I am sure any fears on the contrary are totally overblown.  Here is the one thing: I wasn't really following a Google Glass development, considering that I've no intention jumping on another Google product after getting been burned by Blogger ease of access issues and Readers being closed lower this summer time. But Mark Hurst's publish at Creative Good has pretty appropriately shown that even when Irrrve never use Google Glass, that does not mean I will not have it.

Daily Dose of Cute

Zelda the American RoundybutthoundDudley the GreyhoundAs always, please feel welcome and urged to talk about pix from the fuzzy, feathered, or scaly people of ones own in comments.

Question of the Day

Recommended by Shaker FloraFlora: "What trait would you most value inside a friend?"

This Female Atheist, and Where She Is

[Content Note: Misogyny.]Before I recognized being an atheist, when I had been a teen likely to chapel each week and was on the face a god-believer, I had been, in reality, an agnostic at best. Once, upon confessing my insufficient belief, the minister explained, "Even Jesus had doubts." But I didn't have doubts. I'd no feeling of god.The nearest factor I ever needed to a feeling of god was anxiety when getting in danger, whether that meant karmic retribution from the god who'd not reward a naughty child or eternal damnation. Also it felt virtually identical to the fear I'd of disappointing or angering my parents. It had not been a sense of the infinite it had been no more than fretting about being grounded.I understood I had been designed to have confidence in god, and so i attempted to consider the fantastic florida sunsets and sweeping landscapes where the god-followers around me saw his handiwork and discover him there. Sometimes I pretended I'd. However, all I ever saw was the sun's rays and also the earth.So there have been no tormentful denials, no dramatic fist-trembling rebukes, at god after i found atheism. I simply slid in it, just like a new set of footwear.There have been, however, conscious denials of my religious indoctrination, which in fact had formed me in ways that belief in god, or even the lack thereof, hadn't.The religious community by which I seemed to be elevated didn't allow female ministers, didn't allow female presidents from the congregation, didn't allow female elders, and didn't, for many of my childhood, even allow female lectors to see the chosen Bible blood pressure measurements throughout the service every week. Women were for teaching children—and to clean: Communionware, your kitchen, perhaps a vestment.I began asking them questions relating to this disparity at 7, possibly earlier. I acquired the typical bullshit solutions that are utilized to justify this stuff. I had been sufficiently good to be an acolyte (especially since there have been precious couple of teenage boys willing to get it done) and scrub the toilets—both which Used to do numerous times—but not adequate enough to become ordained. I had been under. Further, my objections to being told, on one side, that we're all equal within the eyes of god, and, alternatively, that my gender nevertheless made me not capable of serving god in each and every capacity open to males, were welcomed with contempt—and sometimes outright hostility. One minister told my mother which i required to stop asking them questions. Another explained I had been "divisive," in an age that needed my searching for "divisive" within the dictionary after i got home from chapel to know his meaning. Another explained that my edgy attitude would find me pregnant or dead when I had been 16.Even so I discovered the conflation from the two…interesting.It was a residential area which I didn't desire to be a part—and I left it, before I understood, with clearness and certainty, that i'm an atheist.Greater than a decade later, I discovered movement atheism online. I had been never someone to evangelize my insufficient god-belief, nor broadcast hate of religion or its enthusiasts, to ensure that area of the movement wasn't a draw. However I did fancy the potential of community around something that's been an axis of marginalization for me personally in certain areas of my existence.I discovered exactly the same inequality, manifesting diversely.There have been precious couple of visible atheist leaders: Probably the most prominent male atheists were very enamored with each other, and never particularly inclined to give the same support to women, via suggested links and outlined quotes and inclusion in digital salons about Important Ideas. They wondered aloud where all of the female atheists are, and ladies would pipe up—"Here! Here i am! We are the following!Inch—only to then return to things as they are, with explicit or implicit texting that ladies just were not being employed as hard because they are, just aren't as wise because they are, otherwise they'd be leaders, too.There is the exclusion from conferences, the sexist posts, the sexual harassment, the appropriation of spiritual and irreligious women's resided encounters to attain Points and also the obdurate not hearing individuals women once they protested.Actually, female atheists' protests were welcomed exactly the same that my protests have been met within my patriarchal chapel. Silencing. Demeaning. Risks.All this felt terribly familiar. A lot of straight, whitened, male gatekeepers pretending there is no gate.Whether or not this was "god's will" getting used to warrant my marginalization, or gender essentialism cloaked in garbage science, did not create a whit of impact on me. Also it does not still.Its not all lady elevated inside a religious tradition had exactly the same experience I'd. You will find a variety of religious traditions. And never every lady that has investigated movement atheism has already established exactly the same encounters I've had. You will find a number of ways to sign up. As well as the ladies who may have had encounters much like mine don't always share my response to either or both.But a great deal do. Enough do.That needs to be an issue towards the males in movement atheism who fancy themselves an excellent option to retrograde patriarchal religious traditions.I'd say I felt just as welcome in movement atheism when i did inside my Missouri Synod Lutheran Chapel, but that might be wrong. Nobody at St. Peter's ever known as us a stupid cunt since i could not agree together.

The Parks and Rec Open Thread

"Again and again!"(Spoilers are becoming bailed out herein.)Parks and Rec has returned! And it is TOO Large TO NAIL! Which veggies will not be necessary. Lights, Camera, Perd! Hi, Jason Schwartzman! Jerry's awesome pep talk! And capitalism wins? Boo. But Ann and Chris are getting an infant! Yay! And April is totes destined to be a vet! I credit Champion with this amazing development! GOOD DOG! Other activities! "These children are leasing my old clothes like they are heading out of fashion. That they won't.Inch "She's my sister! My twin sister in the same mister! Many thanks for employing Hireling Shepherd. This means a lot to me—even though honestly she's THE WOOOOOOOORST! She's the worst person on the planet.Inch "I am watching Iron Guy 2 on my cell phone at this time.Inch "Ann Perkins requested me if I must donate sperm, so she may have a baby. It is a battle—between my primal need to bring a young child into our planet, and my paralyzing anxiety about adversely affecting any living factor." "I heard sack of flour and school. Are you currently ding-dongs making fake drugs for sophomores? Because, if true, This Person wants in!" "I understand this really is gonna hurt, but maybe some Michael Bay." "Ron, what's happening in a City Council meeting? Are you currently lost? Are you currently hurt?" "I, for just one, won't allow her to turn the town right into a socialist hellscape." "I am kinda just fracking for friendship." "Uh, you can easily buy tools online." "Wilson Gromling, from the Liberty or Die Party. These government giveaways are deplorable! You are just providing blank inspections! I had been on food stamps! I had been on welfare! And no-one ever assisted me!" "You earn us porn peddlers!" "Everybody is aware of this song. It's amazing." "I suppose your uter-you and also my uter-me are actually a uterUS!" And lastly: Donna's face when Leslie announces the film they will be watching in the inaugural community film evening may be the Seem of Music...' ' '! Retta! So amazing.Discuss!

Open Thread

Located through the Hungry Tiger.

Meanwhile, in New Zealand...

Nz moves a measure nearer to marriage equality:Nz congress chosen extremely in support of an invoice permitting same-sex marriage Wednesday, basically guaranteeing that it'll soon become law.Congress supported the balance 77 to 44 within the second of three votes required for an invoice to become approved. The 2nd election is usually the key one. The 3rd and final election will probably be nothing more than a formality and is taken as soon as the following month. ... A lot more than 200 people packed in to the Parliament's public gallery to look at congress debate the balance before they chosen at approximately 10:15 p.m. The mostly youthful crowd clapped and cheered for congress who spoke meant for the balance, and sitting alone for individuals who spoke in opposition."I am very excited, as excited because the youthful people," bill sponsor Louisa Wall stated following the election. "It is a fantastic result." ...Nz already has same-sex civil union laws and regulations that confer many legal privileges to gay couples. Polls indicate about two-thirds of recent Zealanders support gay marriage. ...In her own speech supporting the balance, Wall stated denying marriage to the person devalues that person's to participate fully in most that existence offers."Marriage goes to society in general, which necessitates the participation from the whole of society," Wall stated. "The function from the condition in marriage would be to problem permission to 2 individuals who love one another and wish to invest in each other formally. That is what this bill does." Yay!

Headline of the Day

Ezra Klein: Paul Ryan's Budget: Social Engineering having a Side of Deficit Reduction.That about sums up. But I'll nevertheless share this from Ezra's piece too (emphasis mine):[T]he real reason for Ryan's finances are its ambitious reforms, not its savings. It turns Medicare insurance right into a voucher program, turns State medicaid programs, food stamps, and a number of other individuals for that poor into block grants or loans handled through the states, reduces the government role on focal points like infrastructure and education to some small fraction of their current level, and envisions a completely new tax code that is going to do a smaller amount to inspire home purchasing and medical health insurance.Ryan's budget is supposed to do nothing at all under essentially transform the connection between People in america as well as their government. That, and never deficit reduction, is its real point, as it's been Ryan's real point throughout his career.Paul Ryan is terrible. His party is terrible. Their guidelines are terrible. They've been adequately and frequently discredited as terrible.And just what constantly baffles me concerning the terrible championing of these terrible ideas is when terribly short-sighted it's: Progressives notice that we are all within this together—even those who will not get our backs, the bullies who attack us simply to feel less put upon themselves, the self-loathing enablers who harbor foolish hopes for being asked towards the table of privilege eventually, the barrel-chested barons of the new Gilded Age who stand astride the physiques of individuals condemned to less fortunate fates, singing the praises of social Darwinism, bellowing concerning the superfluity of the social back-up, and proclaiming "The federal government never provided anything!" because they deposit seven-figure bonuses thanks to a citizen-funded bailout.Progressives know many of us are within the same leaking, creaky, hard to rely on boat. And understanding that means understanding the most voracious self-interest rates are best offered by egalitarianism: A lot of money may be worth nothing at the end from the sea, under just one cent transported securely to shoreline.

Sure

Joe Lieberman to become listed on conservative think tank. Sounds about right.

The Virtual Pub Is Open

[Explanations: lol your body fat. pathetic anger bread. hey your gay.]TFIF, Shakers!Belly as much as the bar,and title your poison!You should also tip your bartenders!

Daily Dose of Cute

SNOWDOGS!"Where's Dudley?"Sneak attack!So it starts.Rumble in Snow Town."You would like another bit of this course of action?Inch          "HELLS YEAH I Actually Do!InchRumble in Snow Town 2: The Re-Rumbling."I really like you, Dudz."          "I really like you, too, Zelly."Happy Girl.Tired Boy. "Here we are at warmth and goodies now, Two-Legs?"Clearly.

On Naming, Identity, and Choice: Part II

[The Beginning is here now.]So. Among the outcomes of a culture of judgment by which women's options about from the footwear they put on towards the sexual partners they take is the fact that there emerges a language of easy reactions to common choice.A few of these are reflexive qualifications, such as the familiar, "I am a feminist, however i don't hate males," that is a preemptive reaction to the ubiquitous judgment that feminism isn't about disliking patriarchy, but disliking male people.And a number of them are reactions like individuals being talked about within the conversation about title-altering. The example I made use of simply one was: "I needed my entire family to achieve the same surname." The good examples Jill Filipovic utilized in her piece were: "We would like us to talk about a title" or "His surname was better" or "My surname only agreed to be my dad's anyway" – all reasons which make no sense.Departing aside the entirely subjective assessment of whether individuals reasons "seem sensible,Inch when they don't "seem sensibleInch for you, well, maybe there is a reason for your. Which reason may be that they're being easy reactions to some common judgment.I wish to clearly acknowledge that some women cite individuals reasons legitimately. Period. Pause. Break.I should also clearly acknowledge that some women cite individuals reasons uncritically, as with they have never really considered it much, but individuals reasons resonate to 1 degree or any other. Period. Pause. Break.And you will find ladies who cite individuals reasons as their prevalence means they are a simple deflection of somebody impertinently asking her, directly or obliquely, to warrant her choice.This can be a factor that humans do. Particularly if we are inside a vulnerable place, like being requested to warrant a romantic decision regardless of our getting asked the discussion, humans have a tendency to achieve for familiar turns of phrase that people expect will suffice, particularly due to their familiarity.We intuit, quite reasonably, that words that your judgmental inquisitor has heard before, and therefore may be easily placed inside an existent framework, will halt the inquisition. Which has a tendency to work even if the individual doing the asking does not much like your answer.It is good that you will find ladies who are prepared to openly discuss choices about title-altering! I really like a lot when women speak and talk about the options they create with the specific and different prism of the individual conditions!BUT. Nobody is obliged to achieve that. And no one are titled to reasons that "seem sensible.Inch No one are titled to forthright solutions about complex personal choices when needed.When we can acknowledge that asking women to openly discuss and justify their reproductive choices and conditions is wrong, then we have to similarly have the ability to acknowledge that asking women to openly discuss and justify other personal, intimate choices is wrong.(Particularly when we acknowledge you will find ladies who change their names for hugely personal and often distressing reasons. No lady to expect to reveal past familial abuse or sexual violence/stalking to be able to be considered A Great Feminist Who Transformed Her Reputation for a suitable Reason.)There's an in-depth tension surrounding the way you trigger as fair game the personal choices regarding title-altering, in ways we don't for equivalently personal women's options.On one side, individuals are quarrelling that the Title Is The IDENTITY! and it is so goddamn essential that you should not change it out unconditionally ever—and, however, individuals are dealing with title-altering like something so casual it's NO Large WHOOP to demand women to warrant their options to anybody who asks.Your title is everything when you want to judge you. Your title is certainly not special whenever we demand you openly take into account your choices around it. It's just as important or trivial once we deem so that it is to be able to audit your options.This really is bullshit. This really is bullshit.May possibly not function as the worst factor if your lady offering a nonsensical familiar reason behind an individual choice were understood to mean fuck off, it's none of the business.Because seriously? It is not.

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime

The Fleshtones: "The Lady From Baltimore"

Daily Dose of Cute

Matilda is totes regarding this. She really thinks you need to just enter your little fucking boat and obtain the fuck out of here. Go catch a seafood! (After which create it for her. NOM.)[True Fact: Iain and that i were watching Striking Distance, the film whence came the above mentioned-linked clip, which scene just struck us as SO FUNNY that people corrected and rewatched it just like a 1000 occasions, until i was laughing so difficult i was crying. And today it is simply become a standard feature of conversation at Shakes Manor. Like, after i request Iain if he's within the mood to look at a film, and that he indicates Timecop for that biebillionth time, simply to annoy me, I'm certainly going to respond: "Enter your little fucking boat and obtain the fuck out of here!" After I pointed out this to Deeky lately, he thought it was and submitted it to YouTube for me personally, while he rocks !.]Of course, please feel welcome and urged to talk about pix from the fuzzy, feathered, or scaly people of ones own in comments.

More Terrible Republican Ideas

[Content Note: Domestic violence sexuality regulating.]This past year, when covering Congressional Republicans' objections towards the reauthorization from the Violence Against Women Act, I wryly noted the GOP was keen to safeguard the sanctity of traditional domestic violence.Showing that once more the Republican Party is beyond parody, an invoice being considered through the Iowa condition House would "stop [married] parents of minor children from obtaining a 'no-fault' divorce" and would require married parents of minor children "to exhibit a spouse was responsible for infidelity, have been delivered to prison on the criminal offence conviction, had physically or sexually mistreated someone in the household, or had abandoned the household not less than annually.InchNo-fault divorce is really a critical tool for mistreated partners, and/or children being mistreated by one parent, but there's a segment from the population—insert a Venn diagram protecting homophobic conservatives and MRAs—that routinely mischaracterizes no-fault divorce like a mechanism of egregious envy preferred by capricious, guy-disliking, vengeful moms that do not worry about their kids. Therefore we get stupid Think about the kids! rationalizations for attempting to unwind a vital legal victory for mistreated ladies and children. (And males, too.)A 3-member subcommittee debated the balance today. Representative Tedd Gassman, a Republican from Scarville, stated he's worried about the negative impact divorce is wearing children."For me, it's the perfect time to look for the kids rather than constantly fretting about the grown ups," Gassman stated.Not to mention, what Gassman strategies by "look[ing] out for him or herInch is tasking fathers with regulating their daughters' sexuality, so that they don't become dirty sluts."This essentially is definitely an attempt on my small part to help keep fathers in your home,Inch Gassman stated. "I sincerely think that the household may be the first step toward this nation which nation goes the direction in our families. If our families split up, same goes with this nation."…Representative Gassman stated the problem is "near and dear" to his heart because his daughter and boy-in-law lately divorced, putting his daughter in danger.InchThere is a 16-year-old girl within this whole mix now. You know what? Do you know the options of her being more promiscuous?" Gassman stated. "Do you know the options of other things surrounding her existence that the 16-year-old girl, with the body's hormones raging, could possibly get herself into?"I'd be so thrilled basically were Gassman's daughter or daughter, hearing this blowhard justify an invoice that will abet abuse by openly talking about my marriage and/or sexuality. Which would be to say nothing from the horrendo framework that 16-year-old women "get themselves into" challenge with their "raging the body's hormones."Anyway. Many people spoke sense in Iowa in reaction for this absurd proposal:Rachel Scott from the Iowa Coalition Against Domestic Violence told congress the alterations suggested frequently make houses a far more harmful place."One thing that you've seen with places where there's fault divorce could it be gets worse tension and conflict backward and forward people," Scott stated.Representative Marti Anderson, a Democrat from Des Moines who opposes the balance, stated the strain in her own childhood home survived eight years, until her parents divorced when fault needed to be proven."The stay-together time was very, very harmful to my loved ones,Inch stated Anderson — the earliest of 4 children, "and even though we are all grown ups now, I am unsure anybody have ever really become past that."Karl Schilling from the Iowa Organization for Victim Assistance stated no-fault divorce would be a carefully crafted solution to cope with individuals type of problems.Bad Republicans haven't seen a carefully crafted solution they did not wish to annihilate the fuck from.

The Walking Thread

"Neat cat! Which will really enhance Grimes Jail!"(Spoilers are lurching around undeadly herein. CN: Violence racism.)Formerly around the Walking Dead: Clues as to the may happen within this episode from the Walking Dead! Are you able to you know what things may happen within this episode, in line with the moments just proven for you? Unless of course your mind continues to be devoured by zombies, I Wager You Are Able To!Grimes Gang is preparing for war with Unpleasantville, so that they require more weapons. Grimes decides they are driving all of the fuck long ago to his old police station to raid its toolbox. Despite the fact that it appears like Grimesville is fully one 1000 miles away and a century past, it's really merely a short drive. Neat!So: Journey!Michonne is driving from the Chevrolet Volt or whatever, which once offered as Andrea's and Shane's fuckmobile, since the only time Grimes cedes charge of almost anything to anybody ever happens when he really wants to catch some shut-eye. "I am talking about, there is not even any Lady Antebellum around the radio!"—Rick Grimes, most likely. Therefore the black lady reaches be his fucking chauffeur. Ugh this show.On the highway, they fly by a few random whitened dude screaming for his or her help, because he's alone in the center of a zombiepocalypse which shit is frightening. Michonne, Ron, and Carl the Hat provide the backpacker along side it-eye because they zoom by so rapidly the backpacker does not even time for you to appreciate their "Eat My Dust" and "I'd Prefer To Be Patriarchin'!" bumper peel off stickers.The trio results in a classic vehicle wreck, not to mention their vehicle will get stuck within the dirt. Because they get rid of the zombies who converge in it after which look for some junk to stay underneath the tires to free the fuckmobile, we're reminded from the terrific traffic jam of Season One out of which cars filled with dead but non-zombified people totally compromised the later demonstrate that everybody who dies instantly turns into a zombie. Whoooooops!Michonne will get an earful as Grimes and Carl the Hat shit-talk her while busily rooting round the fuckmobile's back finish. Home windows! Michonne is not one of these blah blah yawn fart. This really is known as FORESHADOWING, and that we realize that through the finish from the episode, we are treated to some colossally cumbersome scene of Grimes and Carl the Hat welcoming Michonne in to the bosom of the group. "Here, we've got you a container filled with pandering and racism!"They finally obtain the vehicle unstuck, just like the backpacker comes ruling the crest of the hill within the distance, again pleading for his or her whim, which they don't offer. "Seeya, wouldn't wanna be ya!" They drive away and arrive moments, or even hrs, later at Grimes' old deserted police station, only to discover the armory continues to be ransacked. Merely a single bullet remains LOL.In great news, Hershel's Yell Therapy still appears to become working, as Grimes is abnormally lucid.They enter town, that has some excellent spray-colored signs reading through AWAY Along With You with no GUILT You Will Know and merely LISTEN. Normal stuff. In the center of town, they are available across Stick City, that is a portion of street cordoned served by a lot of barbed wire and pokey stays which zombies impale themselves. Nobody quips, "The ramblers really understand around here," because Merle has returned at Grimes Jail.All of a sudden a masked rifleman on the roof is shooting their way and shouting their way to place lower their weapons and GTFO. There's another no-hit shoot-out, until Carl the Hat will get a success at close range, just knocking the shooter because he's putting on wooden body armor Clearly, and lo and behold the shooter and architect of Stick City is Morgan, the black guy who saved Grimes' existence in the very start of the series as well as for whom Grimes guaranteed to come back but never did.Grimes decides they have to carry Morgan back to his building and then leave him in complete safety, so he and Michonne thread their way through Morgan's number of booby-traps, together with a spear pit hidden within welcome pad LOL. They easily drag his not-corpse on the tripwire and dump him in the studio apartment, which is filled with vast amounts of weapons and it has a awesome blog on your wall.They are nearly to steal some shit and depart when Grimes finds Morgan's 1 / 2 of their walkie-talkie pair and will get all Grimesy about this. Michonne attempts to convince him they have to leave, because Morgan is harmful, but Grimes demands they stay until Morgan awakens. Showing that Michonne is appropriate and Grimes is stupid, Morgan awakens and immediately stabs Grimes, immediately after Carl the Hat will take off on some important hat business and Michonne leaves to babysit him. Morgan and Grimes shout at one another because Males! and Morgan begs Grimes to shoot him, but Grimes will not because shooting someone using their consent makes Grimes really uncomfortable. YELLING! GUILT! Males FAILING Within The PATRIARCHY DRIVES These To Madness! Grimes wants Morgan to include them, and Morgan constitutes a pretty strong situation for remaining put as he informs Grimes, "You'll be torn apart by teeth or bullets!" Grimes responds by accusing Morgan of an excessive amount of optimism LOL THIS SHOW LOL.Meanwhile, Carl the Hat has been a complete brat to Michonne, but Michonne saves his stupid existence anyway. They will use that old nutria subterfuge to draw attention away from zombies while Carl the Hat retrieves an image of his happy family that's hanging in a café. RIP Lori. They almost escape, but Carl the Hat drops the image just within the door. That fucking kid. "We must return!Inch he yells, due to course the authors of the show would steal an legendary line from Lost. Michonne dates back for that picture and returns by using it, together with what appears like a papier-mâché cat fashioned from Rip Taylor's confetti scraps. They're buddies now.After giving Grimes plenty of sensible causes of hesitant to join his number of knuckleheaded children, which Grimes rejects, Morgan informs him, "I must obvious," and in some way that's the miracle mixture of nonsense words which make sense to Grimes, and that he stops badgering Morgan. He hooks support with Michonne and Carl the Hat, plus they leave Stick City, carrying guns along with a crib.Carl the Hat apologizes to Morgan for getting shot him, and Morgan informs him, "Boy, do not ever be sorry." That is a perfect lesson, clearly. If perhaps every little tenderfooted youthful whitened patriarch in the usa were built with a sage black gentleman to inform him he will not be sorry about anything.As they are packing in the fuckmobile, Carl the Hat informs Grimes he thinks Michonne "may be certainly one of us." Fuck you, kid. You would be lucky should you be certainly one of HER. (That does not make any fucking sense, but guess what happens I am talking about!)Predictably, Grimes and Michonne possess a great connecting moment over speaking to dead people. Jokey-jokes! Make things right! BFFs! Nothing states détente just like a meet cute after several weeks of seething hostility!In route to Grimes Jail, the merry trio pass the mangled body from the backpacker. They pause and grab his backpack from the verge, then carry enroute. Important meaning and shit, ya search?Discuss.

Open Thread

Located with a whiting.

FYI

There still appears to become some confusion about whether body regulating, health regulating, figuring out body fat people by the look of them, giving unrequested advice to individuals with disabilities, and related asserted governance of others' physiques is permitted here. It's not.I really hope we are obvious with that now.

Question of the Day

Recommended by Shaker StarGlory: "What's the best factor you have ever become within the mail?"I am sure everybody already knows my response to that one.

My Body, To Love and Hate

[CN: Disability, Body Talk]  Among the fun reasons for getting a disability is when my test is constantly policed with regards to it.In public places spaces, I am not designed to discuss my disability since it makes people uncomfortable to listen to about all of the ways that I'm disadvantaged and they're fortunate. Speaking about my disability can seem an excessive amount of like worrying, or like I am accusing them because of not needing to cope with the daily struggles which i deal with. And discussing how it is prefer to accept a disability could be overwhelming and upsetting, so I am frequently likely to keep everything stuff to myself. I am said to be quiet about them.Simultaneously, I am said to be willing and able to divulge every factor of my own existence because it relates to my disability when needed to be able to justify why I'm able to and should not do something more important during the day. How about we I wish to go to lunch? (Because I'm going to go ahead and take stairs and walk over the parking area towards the vehicle.) So why do I only work every second day? (Because I must lie lower and relaxation for many hrs every second day if I'm not going my to seize up.) Why will not I attend today function? (Because my medication makes evening driving very difficult.) Why will not I put on this lovely necklace? (Because anything hanging from my neck causes me severe discomfort.) And so forth. I am said to be a wide open book, prepared to drop my protection and emotionlessly share everything to be able to clarify curiosity when needed.Although not too emotionlessly, actually. I am said to be cheerful about my disability to ensure that I do not discomfit other people within the room. It's okay to allow them to grimace making sad faces and shake their heads and sorrowfully opine I'm not sure how you're doing so and you're simply so brave simply to wake up each morning, but i smile and grin and jerk and reassure them that, no really, I am happy! I am not sad! I do not get pissed off in the world for that shitty luck from the draw that left me having a high-maintenance body that's constantly in discomfort! And That I certainly don't feel unwavering rage in the countless horde of doctors and nurses who've methodically dehumanized me and unsuccessful to deal with me with fundamental human decency due to various deeply-held prejudices against women, body fat people, and people with chronic discomfort conditions! No, mister. I am a cheerful disabled person. No rancor here. That's what's expected of me, and that i know my devote public good enough to provide since i be aware of social effects which will follow basically don't. I've had an eternity of just living having a disability to understand how I am likely to behave in public places spaces. Especially, I have discovered that I am not designed to express any kind of disappointment against my body system. Even to folks who know me well, and who're confident with the occassional rage-fest against fate, god, and/or even the medical establishment which constantly thumbs its nose at me, the concept that I may not be pleased with my disabled body may cause them profound discomfort. Which is deeply frustrating in my experience, since it appears very natural in my experience a thief having a disability that triggers them constant discomfort might -- might just -- possess a complicated relationship using their body.I really like my body system. I really like generate income try looking in the mirror. I really like the design of my skin, and also the texture of my hair. I really like understanding the location of each and every little childhood scar, and reminiscing concerning the childish incidents that gained individuals marks. I really like will be able to go swimming just like a seafood, which I'm able to walk all around the Condition Fair every summer time. I really like the freckles on my small shoulders and also the soft blonde hair on my small arms. I really like how my hands look so delicately much like my mother's, and exactly how my hair and eyes seem like copies of my father's. I really like my body system a lot, even if the world appears to hate it to be body fat and feminine, but still I really like it. I personally don't like my body system. I personally don't like the way in which my surgical scars help remind me of painful moments I'd rather forget. I personally don't like the feeling from the rods grafted to my spine, and exactly how they constantly pain despite the fact that I am not designed to feel them, and that i hate the way they trigger metal sensors. I personally don't like how a skin throughout my incisions is often numb and should not feel any sensation, and just how my circulation continues to be broken from multiple surgical procedures.I personally don't like the way in which I am in discomfort constantly. I personally don't like that there are just one position I'm able to easily sleep in. I personally don't like that my body system responds to my medicines in several upsetting ways: lightheadedness, fatigue, and short-tempered bursts of frustration in the people I really like. I personally don't like will be able to walk over the Condition Fair per day but that walking across a lengthy parking area can leave me motionless for any week. I personally don't like the randomness and also the never-understanding that always comes with a flare-up. I personally don't like the conflicting advice from my doctors: Relax or you'll hurt yourself, try not to relaxation an excessive amount of or perhaps your muscles will atrophy. Don't lift anything over 15 pounds, but you have to keep working out or you'll only get less strong. And That I hate that this conflicting advice means it does not matter things i do, I am doing the work wrong. I personally don't like that bracelets hurt me, which brazier cause me piercing discomfort. I personally don't like it affects when my father hugs me, while he does not remember to not relaxation his weight on me. I personally don't like it affects when my mother pats my back, because she does not remember that my scar is tender. I personally don't like that you will find occasions after i am having sex to my hubby and all of a sudden all I'm able to feel is discomfort, and all sorts of I'm able to consider is when much I'm not going him to understand it, since it is random and he isn't responsible and I'm not going him to feel guilty for something which is not his fault and first and foremost I'm not going my disability to consider away another factor inside a duration of removing things from me.I personally don't like how costly I'm, and also the mountain tops of hospital bills and accommodation costs. I personally don't like which i cry every single day which i get home from work because my neck affects from looking in the monitor and my back affects from relaxing in my chair. I personally don't like which i can't dance with my buddies, which i can't ride curler coasters with my loved ones, which I can not continue mountain hikes with my hubby. I personally don't like that I must stay at home while my hubby and family continue holidays and family family reunions. I personally don't like that you have a an entire world of no-no-no available, of encounters that I am stopping from getting due to this body that's painful and costly and sometimes feels a lot more like something by which I'm trapped as opposed to a vehicle by which I'm able to go through the marvelous world.So, yes, I've got a very complicated relationship with my body system. And often I seem like indicating that without having to be chiding and condemned and contradicted. I have discovered that when I only say such things as I've got a craptastic body or I wish to trade this body set for a replacement, the people I am talking with often hurry to reassure and contradict and police and silence. They'll let me know that it's actually a lovely body, or that scars don't matter, as if my difficulties with my body system are dependent on vanity. Or they'll reassure me that my disability isn't that bad, that could be a lot worse, as though I am worrying a tad too at the start of the entire disability process. A minimum of you may still walk, the content appears to become. Return when you are inside a motorized wheel chair. They'll offer as comfort the things I am passing up on aren't everything, and that i really should not get lower within the dumps about small things like curler coasters and mountain tops.And That I comprehend the impulse to comfort and console, I truly do, however the message that results in with one of these gentle reassurances and careful rebukes is the fact that I am not really designed to express any dislike whatsoever of my back and my body system. It's wrong to do this, which really the only reasons I possibly could need to do so might be bad ones: Vanity. Envy. Envy. Insufficient perspective. Insufficient gratitude for that good stuff I actually do have within my existence. And so forth.The content I receive, again and again again, is the fact that I am simply not permitted to dislike my body system. Ever. Worst are those who claim that my indicating any type of displeasure with my body system in some way negatively affects individuals with physiques much like or worse than mine. Imagine the way your words will make individuals people feel, they are saying, as if I am not permitted to point out that getting a chronic discomfort disability may be anything under peaches and rainbows. Most likely the idea is the fact that everybody with disabilities are continually inside a fragile condition of convincing ourselves that existence having a disability is really peaches and rainbows and when any kind of us voices a viewpoint on the contrary, then your whole system will break lower.But largest, the content is identical: that since i am disabled, I have to silence myself. I am sure you will find individuals with disabilities available who love themselves completely and without reservation rather than possess a single negative considered themselves. (Individuals are so varied and sophisticated that it might be amazing in my experience to understand otherwise.) But I'm not certainly one of individuals people. Sometimes I dislike my body system -- sometimes I dislike my body system very strongly -- and that i reserve the authority to let them know included in disability advocacy. I reject the framework that individuals coping with disabilities should be cheerful whatsoever occasions, which they need to stifle and silence any complex feelings they may have towards their physiques operating for an abstract Greater Good that demands stiff upper lips from everybody.A part of disability advocacy is knowing and adopting that individuals coping with disabilities are people, meaning they're complex and complex and they've feelings regarding their selves as well as their physiques that they are permitted to possess and express and explore. Expecting individuals with disabilities to become quiet and also to comply with a 1-dimensional expectation of constant cheerful resignation is unfair and oppressive.A part of body-acceptance advocacy is knowing and parsing the main difference between body-negativity that reflects on whole populations without consideration for his or her consent versus body-negativity that's limited entirely to individual exploration about something that's a resource of private discomfort. "My body fat is gross" is really a kyriarchial aesthetic value judgment that's applied across entire populations no matter intent and it is rightfully off-limits inside a safe space "my garbage back is causing problems" is definitely an expression of the individual have a problem with physical restrictions and also the complex and validly negativity which could sometimes exist together having a chronic disability and it is an argument that doesn't affect anybody however the speaker. That contextual difference is essential and can't be overlooked. My feelings about my disabled body are mine to possess and own and express, and whether individuals feelings I've about my disabled body make others uncomfortable inside my failure to adapt to social anticipation for those who have disabled physiques isn't my concern. To police my feelings and also to claim that I am not permitted to possess and express any feeling apart from pure pleasure in the body that triggers me chronic discomfort and deeply limits my movement through our planet is deeply silencing and marginalizing in my experience.Component to be disabled inside a public space is moving the daily demands that I only say nothing about my disability unless of course and until I am requested about this, by which situation I am designed to divulge every factor of it, inside a cheerful manner that causes it to be totally obvious which i hold no ill will towards my body system which I really like meting out these details when needed which I totally don't feel compelled needing to share at this time, no really.However when I'm inside a safe space, minimal I'm able to be permitted to complete is express the sensation that my relationship with my body system is complicated which I sometimes hate my body system for harming me, which it's okay that i can believe that way.