Pope Francis: Nuns Still Need to Shush About Feminism, Gay Rights

[Content note: misogyny, homophobia, anti-choice] Welp, appears like everything Popey-Changey stuff has produced us a lot of same: The Vatican stated inside a statement Monday that Francis had reaffirmed the doctrinal evaluation and critique of U.S. nuns made this past year through the Holy See under his predecessor, Pope Benedict XVI. The assessment accused the Leadership Conference of ladies Religious, a company that signifies most U.S. female Catholic orders, of marketing "radical feminist styles" and disregarding the Vatican's hard line on same-sex marriage and abortion. ...Kenneth Briggs, the writer of the book concerning the Vatican's clash with U.S. nuns, stated Francis' backing from the Holy See's unyielding line was "a significant blow" to prospects for additional dialogue. "It appears such as the Vatican has place a more desirable salesperson responsible for the same kind of product," Briggs stated. You heard right ladies! It's New Coke Pope! Shiny new package, very same shit! I truly have no idea what to say of this. Father James Martin, a Jesuit supporter from the nuns, is cited within the article to be hopeful the nuns will get "a supportive hearing" from Francis, because, like a Jesuit, he's part of a spiritual order themself. Possibly. But could it be really an excessive amount of for part of a purchase using the greatest intellectual status not only to be supportive, but to intellectually build relationships the questions elevated by feminism? He could, rather than adding it towards the listing of the nun's sins, observe that feminism and feminist theory play a huge role in examining social justice concerns? That in helping poor people and desperate, an awareness from the systemic ways gender-based oppression plays into poverty and abuse is useful? And yeah, I understand: serious engagement with feminist theory will enhance the problem of truly improving women when they've doctrinally forbidden the greatest leadership roles (such as the greatest roles in determining and teaching doctrine) which require ordination. And that will be uncomfortable, especially considering the job that nuns do for that Chapel. But when any Catholic Pope has got the intellectual courage to understand more about that, I'd think it might be a Jesuit. As somebody who may be the product of the Catholic education, it saddens me to determine Chapel leadership progressively turn its collective back on intellectualism and particularly around the experience from the social sciences. It's as though the Curiae get their fingers stuck within their ears, eyes shut, yelling "I CAN'T HEAR YOU LALALALALALAAAAAAAAA!" with every new bit of evidence. No, homosexuality isn't the reason for pedophilia. Reproductive privileges could be answer to women's economic and physical well-being. Families may take on a variety of forms but still raise perfectly happy children. Ad infinitum. This is not the Catholic intellectual tradition by which I had been trained, within the publish-Vatican II window where reason and experience shone new light on doctrine, tradition, and belief. Regrettably it is a window that, for the time being, Francis is keeping firmly shut. [Leaving comments Note]: Please be mindful in comments to tell apart between your actions of chapel leadership as well as other Catholics who might not support their leadership in the actions.

On Feminism

I have been very busy on Twitter today (clearly), and that i know not everybody who belongs to the city here's on Twitter, so, with apologies to individuals who're seeing this both in spaces, I am attempting to share the highlights.Simply mind boggling how much hostility continues to be produced through the simple suggestion to exhibit gratitude to feminists/womanists. #tellafeministthankyou&mdash Melissa McEwan (@Shakestweetz) Feb 12, 2013Seems as if there's a minimum of at much antipathy about acknowledging women's value &lifier act as about feminism itself. Not really a coincidence.&mdash Melissa McEwan (@Shakestweetz) Feb 12, 2013I'm also unsurprised to determine once more the tries to discredit feminism by demeaning US activism. Feminism/womanism is global.&mdash Melissa McEwan (@Shakestweetz) Feb 12, 2013And feminists/womanists aren't a monolith. You will find iterations of feminism/womanism around the globe it's different in various spaces.&mdash Melissa McEwan (@Shakestweetz) Feb 12, 2013If you believe there is a One True Feminism, you do not know a really fundamental factor about feminism.&mdash Melissa McEwan (@Shakestweetz) Feb 12, 2013If you believe disliking patriarchy is identical factor as disliking males, you're neglecting to understand a really fundamental factor about feminism.&mdash Melissa McEwan (@Shakestweetz) Feb 12, 2013If you believe feminists are alike, think the same things, hold the same values, you essentially get me wrong feminism.&mdash Melissa McEwan (@Shakestweetz) Feb 12, 2013If you believe males do not have anything to achieve via feminism, especially marginalized males, then you've a fundamental misunderstanding of feminism.&mdash Melissa McEwan (@Shakestweetz) Feb 12, 2013If you believe no feminists can discern the main difference between critique and harassment, you're underestimating feminists.&mdash Melissa McEwan (@Shakestweetz) Feb 12, 2013If you think there's no requirement for feminism, you aren't having to pay attention.&mdash Melissa McEwan (@Shakestweetz) Feb 12, 2013If you believe feminist women can not be funny, you're really missing out.&mdash Melissa McEwan (@Shakestweetz) Feb 12, 2013If you believe feminist ladies have the same needs and goals, allow me to expose you to the idea of intersectionality.&mdash Melissa McEwan (@Shakestweetz) Feb 12, 2013If you think you do not need feminism inside your existence, you're very fortunate. Lucky you!&mdash Melissa McEwan (@Shakestweetz) Feb 12, 2013I invite you to definitely feminism. Should you engage it with higher belief, it could improve your existence.&mdash Melissa McEwan (@Shakestweetz) Feb 12, 2013