This is so the worst thing you're going to read all day.

This is so the worst thing you're going to read all day.

This is so the worst thing you're going to read all day.

[Content Note: Misogyny gender essentialism heterocentrism.]Normally, I would not even link around the world Internet Daily, home of these newspaper luminaries as Chuck Norris and David "The Lesser" Limbaugh, however this is remarkably terrible even through the WND's peerless garbage standards:Actual screencap of actual headline and clearly perfect stock photo.It is simply an excellent article SORRY TO SPOIL THE SURPRISE OF GREATNESS For You Personally with terrific things like:In spite of your beauty and brilliance, it may be your attitude that's stopping you against getting a husband and keeping him.And:Suzanne Venker in her own hot era, How to find a Husband making Peace With Marriage...problems the sexual revolution and feminist movement from the last 4 decades for convincing women not to require more of the associations. ...But exactly how can women find males who're good husbands, fathers and companies? Don't turn to feminists for that solutions, Venker alerts. ...Venker stated the feminist movement has trained women to prevent requiring males – for anything in existence – from companionship to financial support or perhaps childbearing.And:Venker describes the feminist culture has produced unnecessary marital strife for just one large reason: "Women are bitter. They are defensive they are competitive and they are prepared to pounce... [E]quality is definitely the aim. Women wish to prove they are strong and capable and should not be screwed with. For them, that's energy. But all ladies finish up doing is showing to males how angry they're. And who would like to be around someone who's mad constantly?InchVenker alerts women to prevent attempting to contend with their husbands and also to take away the "boss hat" once they go back home – because marriage is all about love, not competition and aggressiveness."Maybe women think being b-tchy is of interest since that is what they are drawn to. Women love men who aren't sweet. They gravitate toward males who're confident, accomplished, company, filled with themselves. Women are forever passing in the nice guy in support of the jerk. However, you can rarely turn this around. Males do not want a b --tch for any wife. So you shouldn't be one."I am talking about, that's some solid advice immediately. It's almost TOO GOOD, really. If Venker is not careful, she is going to GREAT ADVICE Dr. Phil out of the job, which could be kinda bitchy.Or otherwise? I am unsure whether it technically makes a person a bitch to visit all "boss hat" in public places. Are men that do not desire a bitch for any wife okay with bitches as co-workers and/or professional rivals? Anti-feminisming is difficult. Maybe most of us must resolve to defer to males whatsoever occasions, just just in case.[Via HyperVocal.]

So the NRA Gave a Press Conference...

[Content Note: Guns violence disablism.]Igor's had a good review of it here. A complete transcript is here now. Spoiler Alert: The answer is much more guns!My personal favorite part was their recommendation to help keep a national database of people that are psychologically ill. PERFECT. That's only a perfect concept that will certainly not further stigmatize individuals with mental disabilities and discourage care-seeking, identify, and treatment.Just in case I am not lounging it on thick enough, which was sarcasm. It's a terrible idea.A stand-out terrible idea inside a press conference entirely composed of terrible ideas, actually.Anyhow, here are a few tweets concerning the NRA presser that virtually conclude:Evidently the NRA is giving a press conference. Whooooooops I do not provide a fuck exactly what the NRA needs to say about anything any longer.&mdash Melissa McEwan (@Shakestweetz) December 21, 2012THIS Isn't The DAY TO POLITICIZE THE NRA'S PRESS CONFERENCE.&mdash Josh Greenman (@joshgreenman) December 21, 2012"This is actually the oncoming of a significant conversation. We will not be taking any queries today."&mdash daveweigel (@daveweigel) December 21, 2012Surreal: LaPierre requires a national database from the psychologically ill. No similar require a national database of each and every single gun owner.&mdash Solange U (@dcGisenyi) December 21, 2012#nra's response to this tragedy is to locate methods to create more profits for that gun industry.&mdash Renee (@zetablu) December 21, 2012Conservatism truly is damaged.&mdash davidfrum (@davidfrum) December 21, 2012For a business that states be protecting freedom, the NRA is super excited to place their children inside a police condition.&mdash allisonkilkenny (@allisonkilkenny) December 21, 2012Remember when all of the #NRA men stated that Travon Martin would be alive if he'd were built with a hidden 9mm?Me neither.&mdash John Fugelsang (@JohnFugelsang) December 21, 2012And FYI, the NRA has not been quiet so far. They simply weren't speaking to all of us. Plus they were not speaking to all of us in the presser either.&mdash SharkFu (@SharkFu) December 21, 2012The NRA has rickrolled the entire country into watching yet another standard Wayne LaPierre stump speech saying we want more guns.&mdash Rachel Maddow MSNBC (@maddow) December 21, 2012This is exactly what they went quiet for any week to state. THIS. A database from the psychologically ill and guns in each and every school. Wow. #NRA&mdash Sophistication (@graceishuman) December 21, 2012The NRA wants a database from the psychologically ill? LOL okay. Put me onto it. Mix-reference with "list of subscribers who prioritize lives over guns."&mdash Melissa McEwan (@Shakestweetz) December 21, 2012Discuss.